APPLICATION OF ARGUMENTATION IN PROCESSES DECISION MAKING
نویسندگان
چکیده
Making a decision is the most important cognitive procedure that accompanies every human life and plays significant role in history of culture as whole. The entire mankind can, certain sense, be considered making decisions — right or wrong, rational purely intuitive lead to preservation existing state affairs its change. However, theory decision-making arose began developed only middle 20th century, at first operations field military technology. True, it was soon realized has much wider application. So present turned into an interdisciplinary one uses methods mathematics, psychology, sociology, political science, management many other sciences, applied various fields. Philosophical research aimed elucidating epistemological logical foundations also being conducted this field. article emphasizes based on choice not intuition previous experience, but analysis situation. Models argumentation are considered. essence logical, cognitive, rhetorical approaches clarified. stages process explained. Conclusions. difference between basis action/inaction given situation, whereas limited substantiating thesis/refutation antithesis.
منابع مشابه
Argumentation and decision making ?
This paper summarises our position on the use of symbolic methods for reasoning under uncertainty, and argumentation in particular. Our view is that argumentation ooers a complement to numerical methods for reasoning about belief, and a general framework within which many competing approaches can be understood. In applications we have found that argumentation ooers a variety of beneets for prac...
متن کاملNested Argumentation and Its Application to Decision Making over Actions
In this paper we describe a framework in which the grounds for one argument’s defeat of another is itself subject to argumentation. Hence, given two conflicting arguments, each of which defeat the other, one can then determine the preferred defeat and hence the preferred argument. We then apply this nested argumentation to selection of an agent’s preferred ‘instrumental’ arguments, where each s...
متن کاملArgumentation and Decision Making: A Position Paper
This paper summarises our position on the use of symbolic methods for reasoning under uncertainty, and argumentation in particular. Our view is that argumentation ooers a complement to numerical methods for reasoning about belief, and a general framework within which many competing approaches can be understood. In applications we have found that argumentation ooers a variety of beneets for prac...
متن کاملApplication of Business-Driven Decision Making to RESTful Business Processes
Runtime adaptability is a desired quality attribute in business processes, particularly cross-organizational ones. Past work showed that designing and implementing business processes following the REpresentational State Transfer (REST) principles increases runtime adaptability. However, the past solutions for RESTful business processes (RESTfulBP) were limited to manual selection of process fra...
متن کاملFUZZY SOFT MATRIX THEORY AND ITS APPLICATION IN DECISION MAKING
In this work, we define fuzzy soft ($fs$) matrices and theiroperations which are more functional to make theoretical studies inthe $fs$-set theory. We then define products of $fs$-matrices andstudy their properties. We finally construct a $fs$-$max$-$min$decision making method which can be successfully applied to theproblems that contain uncertainties.
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Polìtologì?nij vìsnik
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['2415-881X']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/2415-881x.2022.88.138-148